Animation
Disney’s Lilo & Stitch Remake Is a $100M Nostalgia Fail — What Happened to the Magic?
The beloved 2002 animated classic Lilo & Stitch has officially joined the long list of Disney’s live-action remakes — and it’s a sad downgrade. With the 2025 version now streaming and in theaters, critics and fans are wondering: Did Disney just ruin one of its most heartfelt, culturally rich stories in the name of CGI and kid-friendly fluff? The short answer? Unfortunately, yes.
A Sanitized, Slower Stitch
Directed by Marcel the Shell’s Dean Fleischer Camp, the new Disney’s Lilo & Stitch remake keeps the framework of the original: Lilo Pelekai (played by breakout star Maia Kealoha) is a quirky, grief-stricken girl being raised by her older sister Nani (Sydney Agudong) on the Hawaiian island of Kauaʻi. Stitch, an alien genetic experiment, crash-lands on Earth and becomes an unlikely member of their ohana.
But where the 2002 film was fearless, tackling themes of grief, poverty, and cultural displacement, the 2025 remake dumbs it down for laughs and mucus jokes. Yes, mucus. CGI Stitch spends more time being gross than lovable, with his over-rendered realism making many scenes feel less magical and more stomach-churning.
Gone is the emotional nuance and gorgeous hand-drawn animation. In its place? Slapstick, slower pacing, and a tone that screams “focus group-approved.”
Cultural Depth Replaced With Safe Gags
The original Disney’s Lilo & Stitch was never just a kids’ movie. It had bold subtext about Hawaii’s uneasy relationship with American culture, captured beautifully through Lilo’s love for Elvis, her disdain for clueless tourists, and Cobra Bubbles, the looming child services agent with a darkly comedic presence.
In the remake, all of that’s been softened. Cobra Bubbles has been replaced with a more generic social worker (played by Tia Carrere), and the new alien duo of Pleakley and Jumba (Zach Galifianakis) have lost their charm — and their boldness. Pleakley’s iconic gender-fluid fashion choices have been scrubbed down to avoid controversy, trading creativity for caution.
What was once edgy and unforgettable now feels like another Disney+ filler project.
View this post on Instagram
Stitch Without Soul
Perhaps the biggest failure lies in Stitch himself. In the animated original, he was chaotic yet loveable — a misunderstood “monster” whose growth mirrored Lilo’s need for connection. Now, he’s a CGI cartoon gremlin with too much detail and too little heart.
Critics are calling this another victim of the “live-action remake curse” — a trend where nostalgia is weaponized, creativity is sidelined, and emotional depth is swapped for brand loyalty. As CBC reviewer Jackson Weaver puts it, “2025’s Lilo & Stitch is fine, and likely to entertain the littles. But compared to the genre-defining masterpiece from two decades ago, it’s nothing but demoralizing.”
This version might pass as decent family fare if you’ve never seen the original. But for longtime fans, the live-action Disney’s Lilo & Stitch remake feels like a corporate rehash that misunderstands the soul of its source material. It’s proof that not every animated classic needs a remake, especially when the original did it better.
