Hollywood
Christopher Nolan Says He Will Never Work With Netflix, Calls Its Release Model ‘Mindless’
Filmmaker Christopher Nolan has once again made it clear that he has no interest in working with Netflix, reigniting the long-running debate over theatrical cinema versus streaming-first releases. Nolan’s remarks, originally made during a 2017 interview, have resurfaced amid ongoing industry discussions about shrinking theatrical windows and the future of moviegoing.
When asked about collaborating with the streaming giant, Nolan’s response was blunt: “Why would you?” He went on to criticise Netflix’s approach to film distribution, calling its insistence on simultaneous streaming and theatrical releases a “mindless policy” that undermines cinemas and the wider film ecosystem.
A Filmmaker Committed to the Big Screen
For Nolan, the issue is not rooted in resistance to technology but in what he believes cinema fundamentally represents. The director of Inception, Interstellar, Dunkirk, and Oppenheimer has long championed large-format theatrical experiences, including IMAX and 70mm film, arguing that movies are designed to be seen collectively, not consumed in isolation on personal devices.
Christopher Nolan Elected President of Directors Guild of America
In multiple interviews over the years, Nolan has stressed that the theatrical window is not an outdated relic but the backbone of the film industry. “Theatrical exhibition is what has sustained the film business for a hundred years,” he has said, warning that weakening cinemas risks reducing ambitious filmmaking to disposable content.
Why Netflix’s Release Strategy Bothers Nolan
Nolan’s criticism specifically targets Netflix’s day-and-date release model, which prioritises immediate global streaming availability over exclusive theatrical runs. According to Nolan, this strategy discourages studios from investing in big-budget, visually driven films that rely on box-office performance to justify their scale.
By bypassing traditional theatrical runs, Nolan believes streaming platforms inadvertently erode the economic foundation that allows filmmakers to take creative risks. Without cinemas serving as a primary revenue driver, studios may become increasingly cautious, favouring safer, algorithm-driven content over original, challenging cinema.
View this post on Instagram
The Wider Industry Debate
Nolan’s stance places him at the centre of a broader cultural and business debate in Hollywood. While filmmakers like Martin Scorsese, Denis Villeneuve, and Quentin Tarantino have also voiced concerns about streaming’s dominance, Netflix continues to attract top-tier talent by offering creative freedom, global reach, and generous budgets.
Yet Nolan remains unmoved. His refusal to collaborate with Netflix is a rare example of a filmmaker drawing a firm ideological line in an industry increasingly shaped by convenience and data-driven decision-making.
Cinema as an Event, Not Content
At the heart of Nolan’s argument is a belief that films should feel like events, not background entertainment. For him, protecting theatrical cinema is about preserving a shared cultural experience—one that shapes how stories are told, remembered, and valued.
As streaming platforms continue to reshape Hollywood, Nolan’s uncompromising stance serves as a reminder that the battle over cinema’s future is far from over.
