Pop Music
Trump Administration’s Pop Star Feuds Reveal a No-Win Culture War Strategy
The Trump administration’s repeated clashes with pop stars have exposed a troubling — and increasingly familiar — pattern: the use of chart-topping music as political rage bait, followed by predictable backlash and quiet damage control. From Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo to SZA, artists are pushing back against the White House’s unauthorised use of their songs to promote Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity, turning what appears to be a social media strategy into a cultural reminder of power, propaganda, and provocation.
Pop Music as Political Shock Tactic
The latest controversy erupted after a White House-affiliated account posted a video showing ICE agents chasing, tackling, and arresting people, set to Sabrina Carpenter’s hit “Juno.” The clip leaned heavily into meme culture, pairing violent imagery with flirtatious lyrics — a tactic critics say was designed to shock, provoke, and go viral.
Sabrina Carpenter swiftly condemned the video, calling it “evil and disgusting” and demanding that her music never again be used to promote what she described as an “inhumane agenda.” While her response resonated with fans, it also amplified the very content it opposed — a dynamic the administration appears to exploit deliberately.
A Deliberate Rage-Bait Cycle
This pattern has played out repeatedly. Artists speak out, headlines multiply, and official accounts double down. After Sabrina Carpenter’s criticism, a White House spokesperson publicly mocked her while continuing to frame ICE operations using inflammatory and misleading rhetoric. Days later, the video was quietly deleted, with no explanation — a move that underscored the administration’s preference for provocation over accountability.
According to critics, this is not accidental. The Trump-era communications strategy thrives on engagement at any cost, borrowing from influencer culture where outrage equals visibility. A White House official even admitted that such videos are created knowing media outlets will “breathlessly amplify them.”
View this post on Instagram
Artists Push Back — Loudly
Sabrina Carpenter is far from alone. Olivia Rodrigo previously slammed the White House for pairing her music with deportation messaging. At the same time, SZA recently accused the administration of “rage baiting artists for free promo,” calling the tactic “evil and boring.” Her manager echoed the sentiment, describing the strategy as a cynical attempt to provoke artists into spreading propaganda unintentionally.
These responses highlight the impossible position pop stars face: stay silent and risk seeming complicit, or speak out and fuel the algorithmic fire.
Why This Strategy Keeps Failing
While the Trump administration may succeed in generating clicks, the long-term impact has been reputationally costly. Each incident reinforces the perception of a government willing to trivialise human suffering for memes, while alienating young audiences who dominate pop music fandoms.
As cultural critics note, this is a no-win situation for both sides — but especially for an administration attempting to weaponise art without consent. Public disgust may not stop the memes, but attention doesn’t have to follow.
For now, the message from artists is clear: pop music is not propaganda — and the backlash is only getting louder.
